The Supreme Court acquitted the doctor returned error
in Ankara, which applied in 2005 at a private hospital because of discomfort gallbladder surgery in seven-year legal battle initiated by relatives of patients who lost their lives in progress. Off the result of surgery, who died at another hospital was referred to a doctor about the death of Asim Guler sued for alleged error, the local court in the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court ratified the acquittal of a doctor, returned to General Assembly, the Supreme Court.
Retired Asim
Guler (48), 25 February 2005, was admitted to a private hospital complaining of gallbladder. Opr the same day. Dr. Samet Y. by ‘laparoscopy’ taken off with the surgery Guler, which lasted nearly five hours of surgery in the blood as a result biliribün (a substance in the blood) values were referred to another hospital on the rise. Guler, allegedly by a physician after referral Prof. Dr. Nezih Erverdi’ye giving insufficient information, on the wrong channel, bound not tell; Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital, ‘the proximal common bile duct’ (a canal in the gallbladder) learned late cut off the tip of fully connected. In the meantime, the patient’s body and organs of bankruptcy broke down and died as a result of Guler Asim.
Güler’s relatives, who conducted the operation the patient was referred to Prof. hospital. Dr. Erverdi’nin decent, ‘Dr. Samet Y., thinking that they cut the common bile duct channel Lucka’ description of the judiciary on the topic moved. Family, ‘carelessness and carelessness to cause death’ alleged Dr. Samet Y. Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a criminal complaint about. Describing the prosecutor’s decision of November 11, 2006, ‘common bile duct injury, Mirizzi syndrome’ should be counted as a conviction assessment of complications due to the need koğuşturulmasına By hearing the issue was not to prosecute.
Guler, relatives, lawyers, this time through the decision not to prosecute Mustafa Akinci, Xinjiang has appeal to the High Criminal Court. Xinjiang High Criminal Court on May 28, 2007, by removing non-prosecution decision, ruled on the issue to a public lawsuit. Based on this decision of Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office held on 15 June 2007 indictment, in order to punish the doctor.
the other hand, relatives of Asim Guler, Ankara, Turkey 2 Civil Court of First Instance, lack of support from the spiritual benefits and filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The defense case that Dr. Samet Y., shipped while the patient is in excellent condition, due to the occurrence of death, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, the team suggested that those responsible. Seeing the conclusion of the hearings will continue to claim for compensation in the criminal case.
In addition, prepared under the indictment, Ankara 25 Criminal Court to punish the doctor requesting the trial opened in public. Heard as a witness in the case Dr. Samet Y. ‘s instructors Prof. Dr. Erverdi and Prof. Ahmet decent. Dr. Loyal Ersöz, statements, calls grow for themselves in matters preachs sıkıştıkları bulunduklarını students, students, doctors Samet Y. ‘s calling themselves upon receiving the common bile duct in gallbladder operations, it said on the acceptance of the patient. Erverdi and Ersöz, the defendant physician, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, suggests that the operative Representation of the error expressed upset.
During the trial, the high health priorities for an entire report, the doctor is not defective, the patient died as a result of complications were reported. The conflicting reports on the statements of the doctors and the teachers should be evaluated together, despite the request for the file be referred to the General Assembly of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 25 Criminal Court, Dr. Samet Y. ruled for acquittal.
a trial of the Court of Appeals last word
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 7 YEARS BEAVERS
the decision on appeal, the Supreme Court 9 Criminal Department, upheld the decision of the local court. Guler family’s lawyer, Mustafa Akinci, has appealed against the decision of approval. Constitutional Court, the necessity of high health priorities for an entire report receipt indicating kaldırdığına Akinci lawyer, accused the doctor, Lucka channel mistook the common bile duct, argued that not show the necessary attention and care. Office of the Prosecutor at the Supreme Court finds the appeal, the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals sent the file.
The General Assembly of the Court of Appealsrecently announced karanını. The defendant physician, relying on their knowledge and experience, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court ruling does not indicate the necessary attention and care, Samet Y. ‘s thinking that they cut the common bile duct by detecting channel Lucka, an acquittal instead of’ causing death by negligence ‘should be punished on charges of deciding, approving the decision to remove , the local court reversed the decision.
reaching a new decision of the hands of a lawyer interprets
Mustafa Akinci, “that the Court of Appeals for the local court’s final decision of the General Assembly No. 647 TCK 455/1 of the Law, 2 years imprisonment for up to five years is expected to take a decision. The Supreme Court, especially heavy load of criminal files, despite meticulous examination of the file, 15 pages arrangement reasoned decision, ruling or decision safahattaki examination by all witness statements to create even more pleasing manner, and is increasing the sense of justice. “He said.
Following the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals case, Ankara 25 Court of First Instance Caza be seen again. As announced in the July 2 hearing on the case.
The Supreme Court acquitted the doctor returned error
in Ankara, which applied in 2005 at a private hospital because of discomfort gallbladder surgery in seven-year legal battle initiated by relatives of patients who lost their lives in progress. Off the result of surgery, who died at another hospital was referred to a doctor about the death of Asim Guler sued for alleged error, the local court in the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court ratified the acquittal of a doctor, returned to General Assembly, the Supreme Court.
Retired Asim
Guler (48), 25 February 2005, was admitted to a private hospital complaining of gallbladder. Opr the same day. Dr. Samet Y. by ‘laparoscopy’ taken off with the surgery Guler, which lasted nearly five hours of surgery in the blood as a result biliribün (a substance in the blood) values were referred to another hospital on the rise. Guler, allegedly by a physician after referral Prof. Dr. Nezih Erverdi’ye giving insufficient information, on the wrong channel, bound not tell; Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital, ‘the proximal common bile duct’ (a canal in the gallbladder) learned late cut off the tip of fully connected. In the meantime, the patient’s body and organs of bankruptcy broke down and died as a result of Guler Asim.
Güler’s relatives, who conducted the operation the patient was referred to Prof. hospital. Dr. Erverdi’nin decent, ‘Dr. Samet Y., thinking that they cut the common bile duct channel Lucka’ description of the judiciary on the topic moved. Family, ‘carelessness and carelessness to cause death’ alleged Dr. Samet Y. Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a criminal complaint about. Describing the prosecutor’s decision of November 11, 2006, ‘common bile duct injury, Mirizzi syndrome’ should be counted as a conviction assessment of complications due to the need koğuşturulmasına By hearing the issue was not to prosecute.
Guler, relatives, lawyers, this time through the decision not to prosecute Mustafa Akinci, Xinjiang has appeal to the High Criminal Court. Xinjiang High Criminal Court on May 28, 2007, by removing non-prosecution decision, ruled on the issue to a public lawsuit. Based on this decision of Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office held on 15 June 2007 indictment, in order to punish the doctor.
the other hand, relatives of Asim Guler, Ankara, Turkey 2 Civil Court of First Instance, lack of support from the spiritual benefits and filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The defense case that Dr. Samet Y., shipped while the patient is in excellent condition, due to the occurrence of death, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, the team suggested that those responsible. Seeing the conclusion of the hearings will continue to claim for compensation in the criminal case.
In addition, prepared under the indictment, Ankara 25 Criminal Court to punish the doctor requesting the trial opened in public. Heard as a witness in the case Dr. Samet Y. ‘s instructors Prof. Dr. Erverdi and Prof. Ahmet decent. Dr. Loyal Ersöz, statements, calls grow for themselves in matters preachs sıkıştıkları bulunduklarını students, students, doctors Samet Y. ‘s calling themselves upon receiving the common bile duct in gallbladder operations, it said on the acceptance of the patient. Erverdi and Ersöz, the defendant physician, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, suggests that the operative Representation of the error expressed upset.
During the trial, the high health priorities for an entire report, the doctor is not defective, the patient died as a result of complications were reported. The conflicting reports on the statements of the doctors and the teachers should be evaluated together, despite the request for the file be referred to the General Assembly of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 25 Criminal Court, Dr. Samet Y. ruled for acquittal.
a trial of the Court of Appeals last word
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 7 YEARS BEAVERS
the decision on appeal, the Supreme Court 9 Criminal Department, upheld the decision of the local court. Guler family’s lawyer, Mustafa Akinci, has appealed against the decision of approval. Constitutional Court, the necessity of high health priorities for an entire report receipt indicating kaldırdığına Akinci lawyer, accused the doctor, Lucka channel mistook the common bile duct, argued that not show the necessary attention and care. Office of the Prosecutor at the Supreme Court finds the appeal, the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals sent the file.
The General Assembly of the Court of Appealsrecently announced karanını. The defendant physician, relying on their knowledge and experience, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court ruling does not indicate the necessary attention and care, Samet Y. ‘s thinking that they cut the common bile duct by detecting channel Lucka, an acquittal instead of’ causing death by negligence ‘should be punished on charges of deciding, approving the decision to remove , the local court reversed the decision.
reaching a new decision of the hands of a lawyer interprets
Mustafa Akinci, “that the Court of Appeals for the local court’s final decision of the General Assembly No. 647 TCK 455/1 of the Law, 2 years imprisonment for up to five years is expected to take a decision. The Supreme Court, especially heavy load of criminal files, despite meticulous examination of the file, 15 pages arrangement reasoned decision, ruling or decision safahattaki examination by all witness statements to create even more pleasing manner, and is increasing the sense of justice. “He said.
Following the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals case, Ankara 25 Court of First Instance Caza be seen again. As announced in the July 2 hearing on the case.
The Supreme Court acquitted the doctor returned error
in Ankara, which applied in 2005 at a private hospital because of discomfort gallbladder surgery in seven-year legal battle initiated by relatives of patients who lost their lives in progress. Off the result of surgery, who died at another hospital was referred to a doctor about the death of Asim Guler sued for alleged error, the local court in the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court ratified the acquittal of a doctor, returned to General Assembly, the Supreme Court.
Retired Asim
Guler (48), 25 February 2005, was admitted to a private hospital complaining of gallbladder. Opr the same day. Dr. Samet Y. by ‘laparoscopy’ taken off with the surgery Guler, which lasted nearly five hours of surgery in the blood as a result biliribün (a substance in the blood) values were referred to another hospital on the rise. Guler, allegedly by a physician after referral Prof. Dr. Nezih Erverdi’ye giving insufficient information, on the wrong channel, bound not tell; Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital, ‘the proximal common bile duct’ (a canal in the gallbladder) learned late cut off the tip of fully connected. In the meantime, the patient’s body and organs of bankruptcy broke down and died as a result of Guler Asim.
Güler’s relatives, who conducted the operation the patient was referred to Prof. hospital. Dr. Erverdi’nin decent, ‘Dr. Samet Y., thinking that they cut the common bile duct channel Lucka’ description of the judiciary on the topic moved. Family, ‘carelessness and carelessness to cause death’ alleged Dr. Samet Y. Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a criminal complaint about. Describing the prosecutor’s decision of November 11, 2006, ‘common bile duct injury, Mirizzi syndrome’ should be counted as a conviction assessment of complications due to the need koğuşturulmasına By hearing the issue was not to prosecute.
Guler, relatives, lawyers, this time through the decision not to prosecute Mustafa Akinci, Xinjiang has appeal to the High Criminal Court. Xinjiang High Criminal Court on May 28, 2007, by removing non-prosecution decision, ruled on the issue to a public lawsuit. Based on this decision of Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office held on 15 June 2007 indictment, in order to punish the doctor.
the other hand, relatives of Asim Guler, Ankara, Turkey 2 Civil Court of First Instance, lack of support from the spiritual benefits and filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The defense case that Dr. Samet Y., shipped while the patient is in excellent condition, due to the occurrence of death, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, the team suggested that those responsible. Seeing the conclusion of the hearings will continue to claim for compensation in the criminal case.
In addition, prepared under the indictment, Ankara 25 Criminal Court to punish the doctor requesting the trial opened in public. Heard as a witness in the case Dr. Samet Y. ‘s instructors Prof. Dr. Erverdi and Prof. Ahmet decent. Dr. Loyal Ersöz, statements, calls grow for themselves in matters preachs sıkıştıkları bulunduklarını students, students, doctors Samet Y. ‘s calling themselves upon receiving the common bile duct in gallbladder operations, it said on the acceptance of the patient. Erverdi and Ersöz, the defendant physician, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, suggests that the operative Representation of the error expressed upset.
During the trial, the high health priorities for an entire report, the doctor is not defective, the patient died as a result of complications were reported. The conflicting reports on the statements of the doctors and the teachers should be evaluated together, despite the request for the file be referred to the General Assembly of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 25 Criminal Court, Dr. Samet Y. ruled for acquittal.
a trial of the Court of Appeals last word
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 7 YEARS BEAVERS
the decision on appeal, the Supreme Court 9 Criminal Department, upheld the decision of the local court. Guler family’s lawyer, Mustafa Akinci, has appealed against the decision of approval. Constitutional Court, the necessity of high health priorities for an entire report receipt indicating kaldırdığına Akinci lawyer, accused the doctor, Lucka channel mistook the common bile duct, argued that not show the necessary attention and care. Office of the Prosecutor at the Supreme Court finds the appeal, the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals sent the file.
The General Assembly of the Court of Appealsrecently announced karanını. The defendant physician, relying on their knowledge and experience, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court ruling does not indicate the necessary attention and care, Samet Y. ‘s thinking that they cut the common bile duct by detecting channel Lucka, an acquittal instead of’ causing death by negligence ‘should be punished on charges of deciding, approving the decision to remove , the local court reversed the decision.
reaching a new decision of the hands of a lawyer interprets
Mustafa Akinci, “that the Court of Appeals for the local court’s final decision of the General Assembly No. 647 TCK 455/1 of the Law, 2 years imprisonment for up to five years is expected to take a decision. The Supreme Court, especially heavy load of criminal files, despite meticulous examination of the file, 15 pages arrangement reasoned decision, ruling or decision safahattaki examination by all witness statements to create even more pleasing manner, and is increasing the sense of justice. “He said.
Following the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals case, Ankara 25 Court of First Instance Caza be seen again. As announced in the July 2 hearing on the case.
The Supreme Court acquitted the doctor returned error
in Ankara, which applied in 2005 at a private hospital because of discomfort gallbladder surgery in seven-year legal battle initiated by relatives of patients who lost their lives in progress. Off the result of surgery, who died at another hospital was referred to a doctor about the death of Asim Guler sued for alleged error, the local court in the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court ratified the acquittal of a doctor, returned to General Assembly, the Supreme Court.
Retired Asim
Guler (48), 25 February 2005, was admitted to a private hospital complaining of gallbladder. Opr the same day. Dr. Samet Y. by ‘laparoscopy’ taken off with the surgery Guler, which lasted nearly five hours of surgery in the blood as a result biliribün (a substance in the blood) values were referred to another hospital on the rise. Guler, allegedly by a physician after referral Prof. Dr. Nezih Erverdi’ye giving insufficient information, on the wrong channel, bound not tell; Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital, ‘the proximal common bile duct’ (a canal in the gallbladder) learned late cut off the tip of fully connected. In the meantime, the patient’s body and organs of bankruptcy broke down and died as a result of Guler Asim.
Güler’s relatives, who conducted the operation the patient was referred to Prof. hospital. Dr. Erverdi’nin decent, ‘Dr. Samet Y., thinking that they cut the common bile duct channel Lucka’ description of the judiciary on the topic moved. Family, ‘carelessness and carelessness to cause death’ alleged Dr. Samet Y. Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a criminal complaint about. Describing the prosecutor’s decision of November 11, 2006, ‘common bile duct injury, Mirizzi syndrome’ should be counted as a conviction assessment of complications due to the need koğuşturulmasına By hearing the issue was not to prosecute.
Guler, relatives, lawyers, this time through the decision not to prosecute Mustafa Akinci, Xinjiang has appeal to the High Criminal Court. Xinjiang High Criminal Court on May 28, 2007, by removing non-prosecution decision, ruled on the issue to a public lawsuit. Based on this decision of Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office held on 15 June 2007 indictment, in order to punish the doctor.
the other hand, relatives of Asim Guler, Ankara, Turkey 2 Civil Court of First Instance, lack of support from the spiritual benefits and filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The defense case that Dr. Samet Y., shipped while the patient is in excellent condition, due to the occurrence of death, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, the team suggested that those responsible. Seeing the conclusion of the hearings will continue to claim for compensation in the criminal case.
In addition, prepared under the indictment, Ankara 25 Criminal Court to punish the doctor requesting the trial opened in public. Heard as a witness in the case Dr. Samet Y. ‘s instructors Prof. Dr. Erverdi and Prof. Ahmet decent. Dr. Loyal Ersöz, statements, calls grow for themselves in matters preachs sıkıştıkları bulunduklarını students, students, doctors Samet Y. ‘s calling themselves upon receiving the common bile duct in gallbladder operations, it said on the acceptance of the patient. Erverdi and Ersöz, the defendant physician, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, suggests that the operative Representation of the error expressed upset.
During the trial, the high health priorities for an entire report, the doctor is not defective, the patient died as a result of complications were reported. The conflicting reports on the statements of the doctors and the teachers should be evaluated together, despite the request for the file be referred to the General Assembly of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 25 Criminal Court, Dr. Samet Y. ruled for acquittal.
a trial of the Court of Appeals last word
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 7 YEARS BEAVERS
the decision on appeal, the Supreme Court 9 Criminal Department, upheld the decision of the local court. Guler family’s lawyer, Mustafa Akinci, has appealed against the decision of approval. Constitutional Court, the necessity of high health priorities for an entire report receipt indicating kaldırdığına Akinci lawyer, accused the doctor, Lucka channel mistook the common bile duct, argued that not show the necessary attention and care. Office of the Prosecutor at the Supreme Court finds the appeal, the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals sent the file.
The General Assembly of the Court of Appealsrecently announced karanını. The defendant physician, relying on their knowledge and experience, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court ruling does not indicate the necessary attention and care, Samet Y. ‘s thinking that they cut the common bile duct by detecting channel Lucka, an acquittal instead of’ causing death by negligence ‘should be punished on charges of deciding, approving the decision to remove , the local court reversed the decision.
reaching a new decision of the hands of a lawyer interprets
Mustafa Akinci, “that the Court of Appeals for the local court’s final decision of the General Assembly No. 647 TCK 455/1 of the Law, 2 years imprisonment for up to five years is expected to take a decision. The Supreme Court, especially heavy load of criminal files, despite meticulous examination of the file, 15 pages arrangement reasoned decision, ruling or decision safahattaki examination by all witness statements to create even more pleasing manner, and is increasing the sense of justice. “He said.
Following the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals case, Ankara 25 Court of First Instance Caza be seen again. As announced in the July 2 hearing on the case.
The Supreme Court acquitted the doctor returned error
in Ankara, which applied in 2005 at a private hospital because of discomfort gallbladder surgery in seven-year legal battle initiated by relatives of patients who lost their lives in progress. Off the result of surgery, who died at another hospital was referred to a doctor about the death of Asim Guler sued for alleged error, the local court in the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court ratified the acquittal of a doctor, returned to General Assembly, the Supreme Court.
Retired Asim
Guler (48), 25 February 2005, was admitted to a private hospital complaining of gallbladder. Opr the same day. Dr. Samet Y. by ‘laparoscopy’ taken off with the surgery Guler, which lasted nearly five hours of surgery in the blood as a result biliribün (a substance in the blood) values were referred to another hospital on the rise. Guler, allegedly by a physician after referral Prof. Dr. Nezih Erverdi’ye giving insufficient information, on the wrong channel, bound not tell; Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital, ‘the proximal common bile duct’ (a canal in the gallbladder) learned late cut off the tip of fully connected. In the meantime, the patient’s body and organs of bankruptcy broke down and died as a result of Guler Asim.
Güler’s relatives, who conducted the operation the patient was referred to Prof. hospital. Dr. Erverdi’nin decent, ‘Dr. Samet Y., thinking that they cut the common bile duct channel Lucka’ description of the judiciary on the topic moved. Family, ‘carelessness and carelessness to cause death’ alleged Dr. Samet Y. Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office filed a criminal complaint about. Describing the prosecutor’s decision of November 11, 2006, ‘common bile duct injury, Mirizzi syndrome’ should be counted as a conviction assessment of complications due to the need koğuşturulmasına By hearing the issue was not to prosecute.
Guler, relatives, lawyers, this time through the decision not to prosecute Mustafa Akinci, Xinjiang has appeal to the High Criminal Court. Xinjiang High Criminal Court on May 28, 2007, by removing non-prosecution decision, ruled on the issue to a public lawsuit. Based on this decision of Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office held on 15 June 2007 indictment, in order to punish the doctor.
the other hand, relatives of Asim Guler, Ankara, Turkey 2 Civil Court of First Instance, lack of support from the spiritual benefits and filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The defense case that Dr. Samet Y., shipped while the patient is in excellent condition, due to the occurrence of death, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, the team suggested that those responsible. Seeing the conclusion of the hearings will continue to claim for compensation in the criminal case.
In addition, prepared under the indictment, Ankara 25 Criminal Court to punish the doctor requesting the trial opened in public. Heard as a witness in the case Dr. Samet Y. ‘s instructors Prof. Dr. Erverdi and Prof. Ahmet decent. Dr. Loyal Ersöz, statements, calls grow for themselves in matters preachs sıkıştıkları bulunduklarını students, students, doctors Samet Y. ‘s calling themselves upon receiving the common bile duct in gallbladder operations, it said on the acceptance of the patient. Erverdi and Ersöz, the defendant physician, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, suggests that the operative Representation of the error expressed upset.
During the trial, the high health priorities for an entire report, the doctor is not defective, the patient died as a result of complications were reported. The conflicting reports on the statements of the doctors and the teachers should be evaluated together, despite the request for the file be referred to the General Assembly of Forensic Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 25 Criminal Court, Dr. Samet Y. ruled for acquittal.
a trial of the Court of Appeals last word
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 7 YEARS BEAVERS
the decision on appeal, the Supreme Court 9 Criminal Department, upheld the decision of the local court. Guler family’s lawyer, Mustafa Akinci, has appealed against the decision of approval. Constitutional Court, the necessity of high health priorities for an entire report receipt indicating kaldırdığına Akinci lawyer, accused the doctor, Lucka channel mistook the common bile duct, argued that not show the necessary attention and care. Office of the Prosecutor at the Supreme Court finds the appeal, the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals sent the file.
The General Assembly of the Court of Appealsrecently announced karanını. The defendant physician, relying on their knowledge and experience, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court ruling does not indicate the necessary attention and care, Samet Y. ‘s thinking that they cut the common bile duct by detecting channel Lucka, an acquittal instead of’ causing death by negligence ‘should be punished on charges of deciding, approving the decision to remove , the local court reversed the decision.
reaching a new decision of the hands of a lawyer interprets
Mustafa Akinci, “that the Court of Appeals for the local court’s final decision of the General Assembly No. 647 TCK 455/1 of the Law, 2 years imprisonment for up to five years is expected to take a decision. The Supreme Court, especially heavy load of criminal files, despite meticulous examination of the file, 15 pages arrangement reasoned decision, ruling or decision safahattaki examination by all witness statements to create even more pleasing manner, and is increasing the sense of justice. “He said.
Following the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Appeals case, Ankara 25 Court of First Instance Caza be seen again. As announced in the July 2 hearing on the case.
Provincial Organization of Administrative and Service Units Staff Standards of the Ministry of Health Regulation Amending Regulation
|
Additional Indicators for Health Care Personnel reregulated
Okay Erözgün
all health-Sen President, the Prime Minister Huseyin Celik, a TV channel that the instruction regarding the improvement of the personal rights of sergeants and police officers on the description of the personal rights of health workers in the lowest salary that will be corrected when he asked.
noncommissioned officers and police staff and the degrees of the Government Pension
do reorganization and additional indicators from 2200 to 3600 additional studies will be introduced to the indicator indicating that the Erözgün joy for noncommissioned officers and the police officers, public employees these days, the lowest salary among the personal rights of the correction of health care providers also asked.
Since 1995, additional indicators
any changes to the Health Care Personnel / Erözgün indicating that the increase on September 12, beginning with the cancellation of the law of the Military Coup of health professionals working with the full day of punishment that shocks the understanding that the military power that should be addressed as a priority by the said the victim sector to be run as a major contradiction.
Elongationedana physicians, practitioners and biologists, additional indicators 3600, 3000 Four-year lisansiyer medical staff and pharmacists, other health professionals wanting Erözgün 2200 amendments to the additional indicators, additional indicators of health workers as an indicator of an additional 5000 3600 3000 I paid an additional indicator areas 2200 to 4400, and additional indicators, additional indicators, 3600 to the additional indicator areas demanded to pay.
outside the Ministry of Health physician who served the last applications to improve the personal rights of health workers and full-day değerlendirilmemesini also criticized the scope of the law Erözgün, employee rights, deteriorating team spirit among employees through arrangements made for the restitution of the team concept in health care for health workers to re-establish this arrangement asked to be made within the equity and justice.
health professionals and service components can not produce disaggregated restless and tired psychologically Erözgün claiming to be optimized, in his business, the restless, restless at home, worried about the future, thinking about the future of health care workers developed fully with the health service, despite all this generates sacrifice. Editing will make personnel rights of political will, no doubt benefiting from health services such as health care professionals will happily added that will improve public satisfaction.